翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

plausible denial : ウィキペディア英語版
plausible denial

''Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK?'' is a 1991 book by American attorney, Mark Lane that outlines his theory that former Watergate figure E. Howard Hunt was involved with the Central Intelligence Agency in the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy. Published by Thunder's Mouth Press, the book chronicle's Lane legal defense of Liberty Lobby, a right-wing political group that was sued for libel by Hunt after it published an article in its weekly paper, ''The Spotlight'', linking Hunt — a former CIA operative — to the assassination.〔
Lane's chief source for ''Plausible Denial'' was Marita Lorenz, a woman contacted by Lane during the suit who provided a deposition stating that on the day prior to the assassination she transported guns from Miami to Dallas where she met Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and Jack Ruby. In the book, Lane stated that the CIA arranged the assassination of Kennedy because Kennedy had planned to destroy the Agency.〔 Other said by Lane to be involved in a conspiracy included George H. W. Bush and George de Mohrenschildt, who he implicated as CIA agents.〔
In the book, Lane also blames the media for their failure to cover the trial and their lack of credence given to Kennedy assassination theories.
==Reviews==
''Kirkus Reviews'' said ''Plausible Denial'' was a "convincing report" that was "()ell-reasoned at every point" and ''Publishers Weekly'' called it "() highly stimulating, disturbing book, marred only by repetitiousness and excessive self-justification." Writing for the ''Los Angeles Times'', Alex Raskin wrote: "While Lane's evidence for Hunt's complicity is quite persuasive, his theorizing becomes more suspect when he moves beyond that trial in an attempt to implicate other U.S. government officials in the crime."〔 Raskin added: "Ultimately, many of Lane's theories...are motivated less by actual evidence than by a predisposition to believe in a nefarious Establishment."〔
In a review for the ''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'', Bob Hoover wrote that ''Plausible Denial'' "will give little grist for conspiracy buffs to chew on." Hoover added: "Hunt's link to the (of Kennedy ) is not confirmed by Lane's poorly written and sanctimonious book."〔 Patricia Holt of the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' interviewed Lane and called it "a fascinating and convincing — though uneven and often self-serving — indictment" of the CIA. Lane described ''Plausible Denial'' as his "last word" on the subject and told Holt: "I'll never write another sentence about the (JFK) assassination".〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「plausible denial」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.